looking opinions, reassurance mini, specs have chosen support needs design work. Sure, you can still select between 21- and 27-inch iMac models (which we’d expect to gain.

The Mac mini remains the only true small Mac desktop. Money bit tight moment, viable option me, plus small, portable, can taken anywhere. Design: A Familiar Face, an Amped-Up Core. In exchange we gain more Thunderbolt capacity and better venting. Gone are the SD card slot, two of the USB-A connections and audio input. pretty sure specs have outlined mini ample apps intend on running, correct? concerns, experiences? The 2014 Mac Mini’s connections (bottom) versus the 2018 model’s (top). Running usual apps, adobe cs3 (which have read work snow leopard, correct me if has heard otherwise.), flash, final cut pro, quark itunes et. Final Cut Pro, which is only on Mac can be a decision maker for many budget editors/studios, even though Adobe Premiere (or the top-end expensive Avid suite) is very capable on the PC. A related industry that is pro Mac is video production.

focusing on performance, function, seem mini comes darn close macbook pro, agree? IMO that is why Mac is the default in the Graphic Design industry (besides being stylish). Nontheless, have high end external display, keyboard etc. Upgraded 2.66ghz processor, cost approx $1200 cdn (tax in) compared $2,400 cdn (tax in) 2.66ghz 15' macbook pro has following specs:īasically, mini cost me half of macbook pro cost although not display, keyboard or laptop option mini. Hi all, in thread, had mention mac mini me design work thought come best place opinions.Ĭonsidering macbook pro looking mini, close being par 15' 2.53ghz mbp except has bigger hd (320gb compared 250gb in 15' 2.53 ghz mbp).

Mac mini for graphic design 2014